Evaluating Government Social Programs: Evidence with Heart

Theme selected: Evaluating Government Social Programs. Join us as we turn data into dignity, uncovering what works, for whom, and why—so policies deliver real outcomes, not just promises. Subscribe and share your experiences to strengthen this collective mission.

Why Evaluation Matters for the Public Good

Programs begin with hope, but evaluation connects hope to evidence. By defining desired outcomes upfront, we ensure that services reduce hardship, elevate opportunity, and prove their worth to communities and taxpayers alike.

Start with a clear theory of change: inputs, activities, outputs, and outcomes. Mapping assumptions helps identify evidence needs, surface risks, and align stakeholders before data is collected or a pilot is launched.

Designing Strong Evaluations

Evaluation succeeds when questions match decisions. Are we selecting indicators that matter for families and administrators? Choose measures that reflect lived experience, administrative feasibility, and long-term policy relevance.

Designing Strong Evaluations

Blending Surveys and Administrative Data

Surveys capture voice and context; administrative data anchors rigor and scale. Together they reveal trends, service gaps, and differential impacts across groups while controlling costs and respondent burden in complex environments.

Ethics, Consent, and Privacy

Respectful evaluation protects people. Use clear consent, minimal necessary data, and strong governance. Consider community advisory input when linking datasets to prevent harm and ensure benefits truly reach those most affected.

Data Quality in the Real World

Missing fields, inconsistent codes, and delayed uploads are common. Build validation checks, feedback loops, and training for frontline staff. Tell us which data hurdle slows you most, and we’ll share targeted workarounds.

Finding What Works: Causal Methods

Randomized controlled trials can reveal clear causal effects, especially for new services with limited slots. But success demands ethical designs, transparent criteria, and contingency plans for implementation challenges and participant retention.

Finding What Works: Causal Methods

Difference-in-differences, regression discontinuity, and matching approaches leverage policy rules or timing to mimic experiments. They’re powerful when randomization is impractical, provided assumptions are tested and sensitivity analyses are openly reported.

Measuring Costs Precisely

Track total program costs, including staff time, overhead, and participant burden. Transparent cost accounting clarifies real trade-offs and helps leaders compare interventions fairly across different policy areas and budget cycles.

Learn More

Valuing Outcomes Responsibly

Use credible sources to monetize benefits—health improvements, avoided homelessness, or increased earnings. When monetization is sensitive or incomplete, present cost-effectiveness ratios and distributional impacts alongside qualitative evidence of lived experience.

Learn More

Time Horizons and Scalability

Discount future benefits carefully and analyze scaling scenarios. A program that excels in a pilot may strain resources when expanded. Share how your team handles scaling assumptions, and we’ll highlight best practices.

Learn More

Implementation and Process Evaluation

Track whether services reach the intended people at the intended intensity. Understanding enrollment, dropout, and service hours explains outcome variation and helps refine operations before expanding to new sites.

Implementation and Process Evaluation

Caseworkers and navigators spot barriers first: confusing forms, transit gaps, or language access issues. Build feedback loops that empower staff to fix problems quickly and document insights for policy leaders and evaluators.

Implementation and Process Evaluation

Use rapid-cycle tests to iterate policies. Small changes—like simplified eligibility steps—can boost uptake dramatically. Subscribe for templates and checklists you can adapt for your agency’s improvement sprints next month.

Summarize results plainly, naming what worked, where, and for whom. Acknowledge uncertainty and limitations. Visual dashboards and brief memos help leaders act without losing nuance or overclaiming impacts.

Evaluating Government Social Programs: Evidence with Heart

Why Evaluation Matters for the Public Good

Designing Strong Evaluations

Designing Strong Evaluations

Blending Surveys and Administrative Data

Ethics, Consent, and Privacy

Data Quality in the Real World

Finding What Works: Causal Methods

Finding What Works: Causal Methods

Implementation and Process Evaluation

Implementation and Process Evaluation

Implementation and Process Evaluation

Turning Evidence into Policy Action